- To
-
John Henry Steenhuisen
- From
-
Patricia Lehle
- Subject
- RE: WHO & SA Treaty
- Date
- Oct. 24, 2023, 10:43 a.m.
Dear Mr Steenhuisen
Please be aware that there are many people who agree with the views expressed here and that that number is growing daily.
Each person is a sovereign being. This means they have natural rights to life, freedom, and others. These are as our Creator bestowed upon them. Their only source of accountability is to the Creator*. The sovereign being or person may elect others to govern certain matters on their behalf for their benefit
Every person who serves in an official capacity needs to always do so in a manner consistent with the agreed terms and conditions which they swear an oath to uphold. For example: The South African Constitution and obviously the Bill of Rights, which contain some of our rights as sovereign beings and citizens of South Africa.
The performance of government officials and servants has been found wanting, especially concerning energy, education, and health.
The Covid scam of the past few years has revealed the level of fraud, corruption and indeed treasonous levels that “our” so called officials are willing to sink to. The lockstep approach throughout the world is evidence that they are not acting on behalf of the sovereign people, in accordance with the oath that they took, but rather on behalf of a higher controlling body that is external to South Africa. The mechanism through which this control was usurped was the WHO, a largely privately funded body. Thus, unelected by the people.
The crux of this note to you Mr Steenhuisen, is to ensure that you convey my (and the rest of the awakened masses) dissatisfaction to your organisation in terms of the disastrous way:
1) Most matters pertaining to health have been conducted in the past few years, and
2) efforts by the WHO to legally bind countries (who are members at this stage, such as South Africa) to a Pandemic Preparedness Treaty and International Health Regulations (IHR) that are inconsistent with our Constitution and Bill of Rights** (apart from the violation of the rest of our sovereign rights)—note that health is a fundamental choice of the individual (sovereign) being and a health practitioner (if he/she so chooses) and
3) no one has consulted with the citizens of South Africa at any stage about the plans by the WHO to attempt to usurp the God-given authority over our own health (individually and nationally).
You and every (government) official or servant will be held fully responsible for any deviation from your duties to uphold our rights in the South African Constitution as a minimum and are reminded to cease any activity that is not consistent with the T&Cs in the SA Constitution, as it automatically disqualifies the person to represent the citizens of SA in any capacity whatsoever.
It is the view of an increasing number of people that the government has indeed betrayed the trust of the people of South Africa.
We urge you to demand that we immediately withdraw from the Pandemic Preparedness Treaty and International Health Regulations (IHR) changes before the 1st of November 2023.
* "Sovereignty itself is… not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… while sovereign powers are delegated to government agencies, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts." - (Justice Thomas Stanley Matthews in Yick Wo v. Hopkins [p. 370]);
and
The Freedom Charter affirms that:
"South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white, and that no government can justly claim authority unless it is based on the will of the People;"
** Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94. "An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government."
Future replies will be published here.